Standard Test Method for Evaluating the Performance of Systems that Measure Static, Six Degrees of Freedom (6DOF), Pose
评估静态六自由度(6DOF)姿态测量系统性能的标准试验方法
1.1
目的-
在该测试方法中,提供了用于收集和分析数据以确定姿势测量系统在计算刚性物体的姿势(位置和方向)时的性能的度量和程序。
1.2
该测试方法适用于当进行测量时物体和姿态测量系统都相对于彼此静止的情况。供应商可使用此测试方法确定其六自由度(6DOF)姿态测量系统的性能极限。供应商可使用
9.2
为了生成测试统计信息,然后根据需要应用适当的裕度或缩放因子来生成性能规范。该测试方法还提供了一种统一的方法来报告系统的相对或绝对姿态测量能力,或两者兼而有之,从而可以比较不同系统的性能。
1.3
测试地点-
本试验方法中定义的方法应在环境条件符合姿势测量系统额定条件并满足用户要求的设施中进行。
1.4
单位-
以国际单位制表示的数值应视为标准。本标准不包括其他测量单位。
1.5
本标准并不旨在解决与其使用相关的所有安全问题(如有)。本标准的使用者有责任在使用前建立适当的安全、健康和环境实践,并确定监管限制的适用性。
1.6
本国际标准是根据世界贸易组织技术性贸易壁垒(TBT)委员会发布的《国际标准、指南和建议制定原则决定》中确立的国际公认标准化原则制定的。
=====意义和用途======
5.1
姿态测量系统广泛应用于制造、材料处理、建筑、医学和航空航天等领域。例如,姿态测量系统的使用可以取代通过机械手段固定感兴趣物体姿态的需要。
5.2
由于缺乏标准性能规范和测试方法,潜在用户很难比较姿态测量系统,并且必须依赖供应商关于系统性能、能力和特定应用适用性的规范。该标准使得用户能够评估和比较候选姿态测量系统的性能,并允许用户确定所测量的性能结果是否在供应商关于用户应用的声明规范内。
该标准还通过提供一组通用的度量标准来评估系统性能,从而促进姿势测量系统的改进。
5.3
该测试方法的目的是允许用户确定供应商系统在特定于用户应用的条件下的性能,并确定系统在这些条件下是否仍然按照供应商的规范运行。该测试方法的目的不是验证供应商的声明;尽管在特定情况下,该测试方法可能适用于此目的。
1.1
Purpose—
In this test method, metrics and procedures for collecting and analyzing data to determine the performance of a pose measurement system in computing the pose (position and orientation) of a rigid object are provided.
1.2
This test method applies to the situation in which both the object and the pose measurement system are static with respect to each other when measurements are performed. Vendors may use this test method to establish the performance limits for their six degrees of freedom (6DOF) pose measurement systems. The vendor may use the procedures described in
9.2
to generate the test statistics, then apply an appropriate margin or scaling factor as desired to generate the performance specifications. This test method also provides a uniform way to report the relative or absolute pose measurement capability of the system, or both, making it possible to compare the performance of different systems.
1.3
Test Location—
The methodology defined in this test method shall be performed in a facility in which the environmental conditions are within the pose measurement system’s rated conditions and meet the user’s requirements.
1.4
Units—
The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.
1.5
This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.6
This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
====== Significance And Use ======
5.1
Pose measurement systems are used in a wide range of fields including manufacturing, material handling, construction, medicine, and aerospace. The use of pose measurement systems could, for example, replace the need to fix the poses of objects of interest by mechanical means.
5.2
Potential users have difficulty comparing pose measurement systems because of the lack of standard performance specifications and test methods, and must rely on the specifications of a vendor regarding the system’s performance, capabilities, and suitability for a particular application. This standard makes it possible for a user to assess and compare the performance of candidate pose measurement systems, and allows the user to determine if the measured performance results are within the vendor’s claimed specifications with regard to the user’s application. This standard also facilitates the improvement of pose measurement systems by providing a common set of metrics to evaluate system performance.
5.3
The intent of this test method is to allow a user to determine the performance of a vendor’s system under conditions specific to the user’s application, and to determine whether the system still performs in accordance with the vendor’s specifications under those conditions. The intention of this test method is not to validate a vendor’s claims; although, under specific situations, this test method may be adapted for this purpose.